Technical Audit

Speed and user experience are evaluated through Lighthouse, Core Web Vitals and real-world load time metrics. Largest Contentful Paint, Cumulative Layout Shift and interaction delays are measured across key pages. Bottlenecks such as heavy images, render-blocking scripts and slow server responses are identified with impact scores. Mobile and desktop performance are tested separately since user behavior differs by device. Results are summarized with concrete fixes ranked by effort and expected gain. Third-party scripts and font loading are reported separately for their performance impact.

We examine dependency vulnerabilities, HTTPS configuration, access controls and baseline security risks across your stack. Outdated packages, exposed endpoints and weak authentication patterns are flagged with severity levels. Headers, CORS settings and form protection are checked against common attack vectors. Admin panels and API routes receive focused review for authorization gaps. A security checklist highlights what must be fixed before the next release or public exposure. Data storage, encryption and session management practices are evaluated as well.

Crawl errors, meta structure, indexing status and structured data are verified against search engine guidelines. Broken links, duplicate titles, missing descriptions and orphan pages are catalogued page by page. Sitemap coverage, robots rules and canonical implementation are reviewed for conflicts. Indexation blocks and noindex misuse that could hide important pages are called out explicitly. The audit connects technical SEO issues to ranking and traffic risk so fixes are prioritized logically. Mobile compatibility and the SEO impact of Core Web Vitals are included in the report.

Code quality, maintainability, technical debt and scalability are assessed from a senior engineering perspective. Folder structure, separation of concerns and reuse patterns are reviewed for long-term sustainability. Anti-patterns, dead code and overly coupled modules that slow future work are documented. Database queries, caching strategy and API design are evaluated where they affect performance or reliability. Recommendations focus on practical refactors rather than theoretical perfection. Test coverage, CI/CD setup and deployment processes are part of the architecture review.

WCAG compliance, color contrast, keyboard navigation and screen reader compatibility are tested on critical user flows. Forms, modals, focus states and interactive elements are checked for barriers that exclude users. Missing alt text, unlabeled inputs and insufficient contrast ratios are listed with page references. Basic UX friction points — unclear error messages, tiny tap targets, confusing navigation — are noted alongside formal accessibility issues. Fixes are grouped by severity so you can meet legal and usability standards incrementally. Automated scanning tools and manual testing are used together for a thorough evaluation.

All findings are consolidated into a prioritized action plan with impact analysis and practical improvement steps. Quick wins, medium-effort fixes and strategic initiatives are separated so you can plan resources realistically. Each item includes context, recommended approach and expected outcome where applicable. Critical blockers that affect security, SEO or revenue are highlighted at the top. The plan becomes a shared roadmap your team can execute against without re-reading the full audit. Estimated effort, cost impact and implementation order are clarified for each item.